Sunday, October 12, 2008

Optimistic? Gullible? Naive? Just Plain Stupid? Or Accurate...

This is a conversation that took place on Google chat between Jeff and myself on October 13, 2008. It is about the media, the elections, and the American people.

 Jeff: :)
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_10699853?source%253Dmost_emailed.26978592730A3B8C7F471EACE0DA4EF2.html not that it will happen, but it is an interessting thing to ponder :)
 me: read it already
Jeff: :) you're so up-to-date on current events!
 me: i know!
  just the election
  i read everything i can find
  that's a good one
  about how mccain sold out the reublican party
  how it doesn't raise your temp.
 me: wow
  no i hadnt read that
 Jeff: didn't sound too scripted did it?
 me: she's one delusional person. roves told her how to spin it
  but it sure sounds scripted
  and bullshit
 Jeff: love the way she didn't answer the ONE actual question she was asked
 me: the internet has changed elections....they can't bold face lie anymore and get away with it, there's too much information out there
 Jeff: sure they can. because it's still too difficult to find the truth
  The internet actually makes things even more confusing in some ways
  too many sources
 Most people read the first source they come across and make that the truth
 me: i KNEW u would disagree with me :)
people look for consistency
  and when there is consistency among stories
 Jeff: people?
 me: people learn what to believe
  people are far more critically thinking in this country than you give them credit for
 Jeff: how many sources create consistency?
 me: 3-ish
 Jeff: no they aren't
  people are lazy
 me: there are a shitload of very smart, educated people in this country
  not EVERYONE
  is lazy, stupid, gullible
 Jeff: and an equal amount of lazy under educated ones
 me: we can't be the ONLY smart people in this country
  come on!
 Jeff: exactly!
 me: you sound elitist
 fox news changed elections 4 years ago
  bigtime
  but this year, foxnews is laughable. their reach is only so far
  yes, the convince the stupid, ignorant, lazy people
  but there aren't ENOUGH of them
  who vote
 Jeff: no I don't. I sound realist. I in know way undervalue anyone. I do beleive though that people by nature smart or not so smart as LAZY and prefer to be spoon-fed information
 me: there are a lot of people out there who, like us, do research and make good informed decisions
 Jeff: :)
 me: it seriously sounds like a) either you think WE are stupid, lazy and ignorant or b) you believe we are the only ones out there who aren't
  we'll see come election day
 i am physically lazy
  but not mentally so
 Jeff: put the passion aside love. and yes I AM saying that we as "people" are lazy when it comes to information gathering. if we weren't then spinning wouldn't work. It is in the very essence of spin doctrine that your audience wont dig as much as they should to find the actual facts
 me: yes, i agree, which is why it works on a lot of people
 Jeff: which is all I was saying
 me: i am saying this year we are seeing a difference in that MORE people are out there who are voting who are not being spun
 Jeff: works on all people regardless of an IQ
 me: it's not IQ
  i am not mentally active because i have a high IQ
 Jeff: you just want to fight for the sake of fighting :P
 me: i am because i am passionate, curious, interested and critical thinking (i know you hate that term lol)
 i'm not fighting just strongly disagreeing :)
 Jeff: k, critical thinker.....Tell me what's wrong with Obama?
  :)
 me: k let me think for a minute
  he might be too naive
 Jeff: you mean you haven't though about this already?
me: he may be better with words than action (but i doubt it. he was quite the community organizer, and those people need to know how to get things done)
  i just needed a minute to formulate
 but no, i haven't thought about it a great deal because i have been too focused on beating mccain and the desire to have someone - anyone - else in the whitehouse (who is a democrat)
 Jeff: so then you've fully researched just how effective his results were as an organizer?
  EXACTLY!
  my point!
 me: i was fully critical of clinton
 Jeff: thank you!
  :)
 me: because i had the luxury of being so
  MY original point was this:
 the media is changing....the internet is responsible for that change....because there is now more consistent information out there because if there isn't, you won't be taken seriously
  geez!
and with obama the bottom line is i trust the guy...i have faith
  i trust his intentions are the right ones
 Jeff: but the internet doesn't show consistency sweets. It shows a vast diversity of information both good and bad. YOU and your brain sought out a consistency that held true to your way of thinking. It's no different than deciding which news station to watch on the surface. Sure it's easier to validate a point, because it's at your fingertips, but that doesn't make it the absolute truth, just the convenient one.
 The internet is only a tool. not a truth
  me: ok ok ok we can agree to disagree
 Jeff: :)